Anonymous user
Policy/Parking: Difference between revisions
→Objections:
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 30:
For no good reason. The rLab is a social and a hacking space, but parking should be for one use and not the other? What about the social meet up, I assumed parking isn't allowed for that?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I tend to disagree with this objection. Parking at Hackspace is fairly easy most evenings, but during weekdays the garage has many cars on their 'forecourt', and our 'builder' neighbour has his vans coming and going. With three or four members visiting by car there is often no space for anyone else. Parking in Reading is horribly expensive, but that does not give hack-space members to use the space as a 'private' parking resource. If you park, then go into town you aren't around if anyone needs you to move your wagon.
=Brief Absences:=
Line 52 ⟶ 56:
We rely on the spirit of cooperation and mutual respect among members to adhere to these guidelines. If issues arise, they will be addressed on a case-by-case basis by the rLab membership/directors .
===Objections:===
That first paragraph is a mess of nonsense. Many laughs have been had over the concept of trying to ban vehicle repairs, that would include bikes, robots, boats and cars, not just vans remember.
Line 65 ⟶ 69:
Again, this policy idea is to fix a problem that we don't have.
People could take advantage of our first
So, shall we make new rules up to combat this hypothetical problem?
| |||